Trump Ads Tap Border Security, Memorial Funds
The Trump administration used $20 million in DHS funds tied to border security and commemorative events for campaign-style TV ads featuring the president, drawing bipartisan scrutiny Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America / Wikimedia Commons

The Trump administration is paying for campaign-style television advertisements with money moved from a border security fund into an account for memorials and ceremonies, according to federal spending records.

On 19 September 2026, the White House Office of Management and Budget added about £14.7 million ($20 million) to a Department of Homeland Security budget line for commemorative events, drawing on money Congress had allocated to Customs and Border Protection, Washington Post reported on Thursday 1 October.

The following day, DHS awarded a contract of the same value for a national media campaign, and the advertisements began airing days later.

The White House calls the spots public service announcements; Democrats in Congress say the spending is unlawful.

From Memorial Ceremonies To Prime-Time Football

The money passed through an obscure account. DHS and OMB had originally planned to spend about £737,000 ($1 million) on commemorative events, according to OMB records reviewed by the Post, before adding £14.7 million ($20 million) to the line.

A House Budget Committee report described the commemorative events funding as covering 'Line-of-Duty death memorials, Department or agency anniversaries, and commendation ceremonies'.

The additional money came from a much larger pot. OMB drew on almost £4.9 billion ($6.7 billion) that the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act allocated to Customs and Border Protection for specified purposes, including port-of-entry inspection equipment, border surveillance, biometric technology and efforts to combat drug trafficking.

The contract followed within a day. On 20 September, DHS awarded £14.7 million ($20 million) to LMD Agency, a Maryland-based firm, for a national media campaign, the Post reported. Customs and Border Protection funded the advertisements, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Recycled Campaign Material, 'Paid for by the US Government'

The most widely discussed spot shows Trump walking down a corridor in black and white as he declares that 'this is the final battle' and vows to demolish the deep state.

It is nearly identical to campaign material Trump used in 2024, including a version CNN reported was posted to Truth Social in January 2024, with the campaign logo removed and the words 'Paid for by the US Government' added at the end. Versions of the same message appeared on his Truth Social account as early as November 2023.

It is one of three government-funded spots that have aired during NFL games, Sunday morning news programmes and primetime broadcasts.

As of 29 September, the ad-tracking firm AdImpact estimated that more than £1.25 million ($1.7 million) had been spent airing them, NBC News reported. By 1 October, the Post reported, the figure had risen to more than £1.84 million ($2.5 million).

Appropriators Say the Ads Are 'Illegal'

Senate Democrats have demanded answers. In a letter dated 29 September to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, Senators Patty Murray and Chris Murphy wrote that using government funding to create or air political ads of this kind is illegal and a shockingly corrupt misuse of taxpayer dollars.

They requested contracting records and asked whether Mullin had discussed the spending with Trump.

The objections are not confined to Democrats. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the advertising 'shouldn't be paid for with taxpayer dollars', and Senators John Kennedy and Thom Tillis also questioned the use of public money, the Associated Press reported.

The legal question turns on longstanding restrictions. Federal appropriations law restricts agencies from using public funds for unauthorised publicity or propaganda, and the Government Accountability Office has previously identified self-aggrandising, covert or purely partisan government communications as potentially prohibited.

Critics argue the Trump advertisements fall into those categories; the administration disputes that, and no ruling has been made on these spots.

'Very Clearly Not Campaign Ads'

The administration rejects the characterisation. The White House has compared the spots to public service announcements run by previous administrations on Medicare, the Affordable Care Act and COVID-19 vaccination, saying the new commercials 'are very clearly not campaign ads'.

'The ad is educational and unapologetically patriotic,' a White House spokesperson said. 'We should be proud of our country.'

Other agencies offered little detail. A White House spokesperson who was not identified referred questions to OMB and DHS, and a DHS spokesperson said the department makes contracting decisions in accordance with applicable laws. The administration has continued to defend the advertisements.

The administration moved £14.7 million ($20 million) from a border security fund into a commemorative events account and spent it on advertisements featuring the president; critics call that unlawful propaganda, and the White House calls it a public service.