Mixed reactions on social media to Justin Bieber's photo with Royal Bengal tiger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35a9b/35a9bd250a78afd7ce1e464b6614b73789cb21a2" alt="Justin Bieber"
Justin Bieber attended the engagement ceremony of his father Jeremy to long-term girlfriend Chelsey Rebelo in Toronto on 30 April. The private ceremony, which doubled up as an art event, featured fictional superheroes, the Batmobile, and a live Royal Bengal tiger.
However, soon after the 22-year-old shared images from the event – wherein he can be seen petting the tiger – on Instagram, he received some major backlash.
Bieber's close-up with the big cat clearly did not go down well with his fans. One user criticised the singer for not treating the exotic animal appropriately and wrote: "Hey Justin Bieber, Tigers are abused to make them submissive. Be cool & condemn the way they are treated."
Hey .@justinbieber#Tiger's are abused to make them submissive.
— ANIMAL ADVOCATE â (@_AnimalAdvocate) May 1, 2016
Be cool & condemn the way they are treated.@Petaðhttps://t.co/CrKzloy1RW
Some even mocked the Baby singer for his photo-op with the animal and said, "So Justin Bieber was hungover this morning, then later he gets to go pet a tiger. What a CHILL hangover cure."
So @justinbieber was hungover this morning, then later he gets to go pet a tiger. What a CHILL hangover cure pic.twitter.com/1G9NmV4ECQ
— The Knocks (@theknocks) April 30, 2016
Another user, poking fun at the singer, tweeted, "Justin Bieber's life is so casual. One minute he's posting about his haircut. Next minute he's petting a tiger. It's fine."
justin bieber's life is so casual. one minute he's posting about his haircut. next minute he's petting a tiger. it's fine.
— Leyla Ashraf (@leylaiscool) April 30, 2016
While most fans were enraged with the image posted by the singer-performer, Bieber's fans unfailingly supported their idol through thick and thin. One Twitter user wrote, people using the exotic animals as a display object are equally guilty.
@peta why are you not coming after the people that brought those animals there? Justin is not responsible for everything in this world.
— bea (@nohpressures) May 1, 2016
Another argued that since it was an art show, the tiger was present, "which has got nothing to do with the Baby hitmaker".
@peta It was an Art show. It has nothing to do with Justin he never hired the tiger. You're only blaming him cause he's an easy target smh ð
— ï¸ (@gomezexcIusives) May 1, 2016
Animal rights group Peta objected to the pictures of the What Do You Mean singer with the leashed animal. In a letter sent to Bieber explaining the perils of such a "cruel and dangerous" photo-op, Peta urged others as well to prohibit from such indulgences.
Lisa Lange, Senior Vice President of PETA said in a statement: "Justin Bieber is lucky not to have had his throat torn out by this stressed captive tiger."
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.